Skip to content

No more Mandates, Masks nor QR entry

    larryhannigan – Jan 17, 2021

    IMPORTANT REMINDER FOR BUSINESSES.

    Written by an Australian Barrister.

    A mandate is essentially just a request, and has no official standing within law. A mandate only truly comes into force when the person/business who is requested takes part/agrees. So yes, the government response here is correct. It’s extremely dirty, but it’s correct.

    The government is doing indirectly what it can’t do directly, and is passing the legal buck onto businesses. Businesses can of course be sued under the law, if they enforce any mandates which are contrary to law (as in, actual legislation, written in black and white).

    Everyone must be so, so careful. Mandates are essentially null and void if they are challenged in court, as they are only a request/direction/rule – they are not law. Also, if you receive a fine for not following a mandate, it can be challenged in court and it’ll be thrown out as you technically haven’t broken a law.

    NOTICE OF LIABILTY

    Right of Entry To Commercial Premises — Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988—Section 94H

    All State and Territory declared vaccine mandates are unlawful and in breach of the Australian Constitution section 51(xxiiiA), The Commonwealth Consolidated Acts—Privacy Act 1988—Section 94H

    A mandate is essentially just a request, and has no official standing within; the Nuremberg Code of which Australia upheld after WWII and is a signatory, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as well as other federal and state laws including the Federal Biosecurity Act which makes any coercion or compulsion of any medical procedure unlawful including expressly “vaccines” without freely given informed consent.

    The misuse of the word ‘Mandatory’ by states does not give them legislative right over the Australian

    Constitution section 51(xxiiiA), Federal Legislation and International Agreements and Laws.

    We are not required to disclose medical health records or health information to anyone.

    Such is privileged information between patient and Doctor — any coercion is in breach of the Commonwealth Privacy Act punishable by law.

    I have not stated I will not comply only that such will be considered.

    Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988—Section 94H

    (2) A person commits an offence if the person:

    (c) refuses to allow another person to enter:

    (i) premises that are otherwise accessible to the public; or

    (ii) premises that the other person has a right to enter.

    Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.

    Australian Human Rights Commission: Report all breaches 1300 656 419.

    No business private or public can discriminate against anyone based on race, religion, health, or disability.

    Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 section 51(xxiiiA).

    No government has authority to compel forced vaccinations by intimidation or by restriction of activities

    A Summary of section 51(xxiiiA) of the Constitution and related case law surrounding the subject matter of “Forced Vaccinations”. A 95-page High Court ruling on the meaning of this provision. British Medical Association v Commonwealth [1949] HCA 44; (1949) 79 CLR 201 (7 October 1949). When Parliament comes between patient and doctor and makes the lawful continuance of their relationship as such depend upon a condition, enforceable by fine, that the doctor shall render the patient a special service, unless that service is waived by the patient, it creates a situation that amounts to a form of (Unlawful) civil conscription.”(at p 295).

    When denied entry give them a copy of this and advise unless they permit free access they will be reported for breach of laws and involve Supreme Court Class Actions:

    Take a photo of the person, details of the premises, time, and date.

    By the way, 300 penalty unit’s in today money is about $66,000 individual and to the establishment who are trying to enforce these illegal rules. The worker and the business can be sued separately and amount of $66,000 each…

    this was written by an Australian Barrister.

    Leave a Comment